Case Study
Custom Speaker Component Manufacturing (IPX7, PP Enclosure)
- Consumer Electronics / Audio
- Injection Molding + Mold Making
- PP / ABS / ABS+PC
- ±0.02mm (parts) / ±0.05mm (mold)
- Gloss (PP replicates mold)
- 150+ mold sets / 30 models
- 8 weeks (production tooling)
The Challenge
Our Solution
A 0.1 mm deviation in speaker mold accuracy causes air leaks, vibration and distortion — especially in small drivers. We classified parts: critical acoustic/assembly features at 0.025–0.05 mm, reflex ports relaxed to 0.1 mm.
Material trade-offs we navigated
PP shrinks up to 1.8% (semi-crystalline); PC/ABS shrink 0.3–0.7% (amorphous). PP damps best but is hard to paint; PEI has superior acoustics but needs expensive high-temp tooling. We chose PP for the enclosure, balanced with ABS for outer casing impact strength.
Mold testing (T0 → T1)
Pre-trial CMM inspection of cavity/core vs blueprint; steel hardness check on sliders/cavity/core; cooling-water pressure test for leaks; manual lube/cycle of moving parts. T0 basic function, T1 quality + weight verification.
FAQ
Best material for speaker enclosure? PP for damping; ABS/PC for durable outer casings.
Speaker grille open-area ratio? 60–80% for acoustic transparency with minimal restriction.
From this audio program to your next molded or machined part — one integrated shop.